Recent
studies indicate the growing popularity of Complementary and Alternative
Medicine (CAM), as both the general public and healthcare sector fall for new
integrative possibilities.
A
review conducted by researchers at the Universities of Exeter and Plymouth in
the United Kingdom expressed concern over the need for more clinical,
scientific evidence and trials in CAM journals.
The
authors explained that previous research suggested that CAM journals publish
few clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses and a high proportion
of positive articles.
The
study described the content of major CAM journals in 2005 and compared key
findings with secondary data from previous years.
The
study found that there is an apparent shift away from effectiveness research in
CAM journals. The authors suggested that further investigation is needed as
well as comparisons with other journals. The large proportion of positive
articles published in CAM journals appears to not adequately reflect the best
available evidence on the effectiveness of these therapies. This has
implications for those using CAM journals as their main source of information
in this area.
Another
study conducted by scientists at the Université de Sherbrooke in Canada
explained that the use of complementary and alternative medical therapies is
common and increasing, particularly for children with chronic disease.
Researchers
explained that the purpose of their study was to describe the use of CAM by
children and to identify factors that may influence the use of CAM.
The
cross-sectional descriptive study included children who were visiting a
pediatric outpatient clinic. Parent's satisfaction about primary care was
evaluated with the Parent's Perceptions of Pediatric Primary Care Quality
questionnaire.
The
study found that 54 percent of children used at least one type of CAM in the
previous year. No sociodemographic characteristic difference was found between
user and nonuser groups. Children most often used CAM to treat musculoskeletal
problems (27 percent), psychological problems (24percent) or infections (20
percent).
Factors
that influenced CAM use were "word of mouth" (36 percent),
"reference by a physician" (28 percent), "personal experience by
parents" (28 percent) and "no adequate resources in 'traditional'
medicine" (21 percent).
Forty-seven
percent of CAM users used prescribed medications simultaneously. Most users (75
percent) believed that CAM had no potential adverse effects or interactions
with prescribed medication. Only 44 percent of CAM users were known as such by
their physician. The primary care satisfaction was significantly lower in CAM
users versus nonusers. Parents of CAM users were less satisfied in the areas of
accessibility, knowledge of the patient and communication.
The
study authors concluded that it is important that physicians systematically
elicit families' expectations of treatment and be aware of the range of
therapies used by children.
Finally,
researchers at Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine in
Portland, Oregon conducted a survey containing a variety of assessments of
attitudes toward CAM and the personality traits of adventurousness and tolerance
to ambiguity among students entering four Portland, Oregon doctoral-level
health professional schools and an allopathic medical school in the Upper
Midwest (University of Nebraska College of Medicine) during the 2004-2005
academic year.
Students
of naturopathy (63 students) and Oriental Medicine (71 students) were the most
"CAM positive," adventurous and tolerant of ambiguity, and Midwestern
allopathic medical students (58 students) the least. In general, chiropractic
students (89 students) and allopathic medical students from the Pacific
Northwest (95 students) were intermediate in CAM attitudes between these two
groups. Female students were more "CAM positive" in all schools
compared to male students.
The
study authors concluded that students have high levels of interest in CAM upon
entrance to their schools. Health professional discipline, geographic location,
personality qualities and gender appear to influence CAM attitudes in entering
students.
Natural
Standard is an international research collaboration that aggregates and
synthesizes data on complementary and alternative therapies. Using a
comprehensive methodology and reproducible grading scales, information is
created that is evidence-based, consensus-based and peer-reviewed, tapping into
the collective expertise of a multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The mission of
this collaboration is to provide objective, reliable information that aids
clinicians, patients and healthcare institutions in making more informed and
safer therapeutic decisions. Natural Standard is
widely recognized as one of the world's premier sources of information in this
area. For more information, please contact us.