Recent studies on the possible
negative effects of birth control on the heart have raised awareness on the
lack of long-term safety data on birth control.
Consumers may be interested to learn that present studies have proven the
effectiveness of a modern form of natural family planning. Additionally, the
federal government has approved two codes specifically for natural family
planning within the medical coding system used by the government, insurance
companies, medical clinics and healthcare providers.
On October 1, 2007, the
International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification
(ICD-9-CM) published the following codes for natural family planning:
- V25.04: Counseling and instruction in natural family planning to avoid pregnancy;
- V26.41: Procreative counseling and advice using natural family planning.
Guidelines for reporting and coding
with the ICD-9-CM are made by two federal government agencies: the National
Center for Health Statistics and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services. Guidelines also are approved by four participating agencies: the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the National Center for Health
Statistics, the American Hospital Association and the American Health
Information Management Association.
The publishing of the ICD-9-CM codes
for natural family planning allows health insurance companies to cover
activities such as education classes in the methods of natural family planning.
This information comes along with
the new U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report that
Chlamydia and other sexually transmitted diseases are at an all time high in
girls and young women, often resulting in infertility. The report suggests that
this increase in STDs may be a result of the misuse of, and lack of education
surrounding, birth control pills.
Researchers from the University of
Heidelberg in Germany have found that a method of natural family planning that
uses two indicators to identify the fertile phase in a woman's menstrual cycle
is as effective as the contraceptive pill for avoiding unplanned pregnancies if
used correctly.
In the study, the effectiveness of
fertility awareness based (FAB) methods of family planning was critically
reviewed. The study specifically investigated the efficacy and the
acceptability of the symptothermal method (STM), a FAB method that uses two
indicators of fertility: temperature and cervical secretions observation.
In the largest study of STM, the
researchers found that if the couples either abstained from sex or used a
barrier method during the fertile period, the rate of unplanned pregnancies per
year was 0.4% and 0.6% respectively. Out of all the 900 women who took part in
the study, including those who had unprotected sex during their fertile period,
1.8 per 100 became unintentionally pregnant.
The study authors suggested that the
effectiveness of STM is comparable to the effectiveness of modern contraceptive
methods such as oral contraceptives, and is an effective and acceptable method
of family planning.
A number of fertility awareness
based methods of family planning have been advocated over the years, but
comparisons between different methods and studies of their effectiveness have
been limited and hampered by problems such as differences in cultural
backgrounds, different ways to measure the effectiveness of a FAB method,
different ways of classifying unintended pregnancies and other study design
problems, according to the researchers.
The researchers recommended that
women or couples who want to learn the method should buy a book, attend an NFP
course or get some teaching by a qualified NFP teacher and acknowledged that
although learning STM is usually no problem, in contrast to the oral
contraceptive pill or other family planning methods, STM needs more engagement
and time to learn it.
Every month the women in the study
sent charts to the researchers that showed their cycles and their observations
of temperature and cervical secretions and that recorded their sexual behavior
and family planning intentions for the next cycle.
Of the 900 women, 322 used only STM
and 509 women used STM with occasional barriers during the fertile time. Sixty-nine
women did not document their sexual behavior. Out of the women who documented
their sexual behavior and abstained from sex during their fertile period
("perfect use"), the unintended pregnancy rate was 0.4 per 100 women
and 13 cycles, and 0.6 for women who used STM plus a barrier if they had sex
during their fertile period.
For cycles in which couples had
unprotected sex during the fertile phase, the pregnancy rates rose to 7.5 per
100 women and 13 cycles. The drop-out rate from using STM for reasons such as
dissatisfaction or difficulties with the method was 9.2 per 100 women and 13
cycles, and compared well with the drop-out rates from other methods of family
planning, which can be as high as 30 percent, although direct comparisons are
difficult due to study design problems. The study authors believe there was a
fairly good acceptability for this particular FAB method.
The study reports that the authors
were surprised by the relatively low rate of unintended pregnancies (7.5
percent) among women who had unprotected sex during their fertile period. The
authors explained that if people are trying for pregnancy, a pregnancy rate of
28 percent per cycle is expected.
The study authors concluded that STM
is a highly effective family planning method, provided the appropriate
guidelines are consistently adhered to.
Early studies have also suggested
that couples who practice NFP: have a dramatically low (0.2%) divorce rate;
experience happier marriages; are happier and more satisfied in their everyday
lives; have considerably more marital relations; share a deeper intimacy with
their spouse than those who contracept; and realize a deeper level of
communication with their spouse. Further, more well-designed studies are
needed.
For more information on natural
therapies and fertility, please visit Natural Standard's Foods, Herbs & Supplements and Health
& Wellness databases.