« Hormone Therapy Health Risks | Main | Team Sports for Overweight Children »

April 02, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c7bb653ef00e551a4a8bf8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Whole Body Vibration for Parkinson’s Disease:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I started using whole-body vibration about 9 months ago to increase the strength in my legs. Within 6 months of using the vibration exercise machine, I lost 35 lbs, regained the strength and tone in my legs, lost cellulite, have not had any lower back muscles spasms and generally feel great after using this machine.

You can read my testimonial at www.vibrafitbody.com, as I was so excited with the results I got that I really wanted to share this with others.

I agree with Danielle and CE. Why are we wasting time with therapies that are only equal to what we have now? Let's spend our money on more advanced research, like adult stem cells.

learn more at http://www.myPARKINSONSINFORMATION.NET

What about using whole body vibration and similar techniques to prevent Parkinson’s? Researchers should spend their time focusing on how to prevent the disease rather than how to just treat the symptoms. Health are in general places too much emphasis on “How do I fix what's wrong?” and not “How do I keep this from happening in the first place?” There needs to be a complete shift in treatment philosophy.

Whole body vibration therapy may improve symptoms of Parkinson’s disease, at least based on this study, but is it better than other therapies that are already available? As others have discussed, why not use conventional therapy instead since it is also effective? Whole body vibration does not seem to be a more convenient or a cost-effective option for patients with this disease, since patients in the study had two treatments daily, five days each week. I also agree with the importance of conducting more research on the use of stem cells for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. It seems more relevant to be putting resources into a new and promising therapy option for such a debilitating disease.

A trial with only 27 patients per group does not influence my opinion on this subject very much. All patients were on stable dopamine-replacement therapy before entering either treatment group. I’m curious as to the cost of such treatment with whole body vibration (WBV). Considering that this trial only conducted a four-week follow up assessment, I’m not convinced patients undergoing this therapy would not need life-long WBV, thus accruing a greater cost to the patient. Also, daily sessions may just not be feasible for patients to undergo.

I agree with Julie. More research and money needs to go into finding therapies that help cure the disease, not just improving symptoms. While improving symptoms and quality of life are important options, a true cure is what will truly help patients with Parkinson’s disease.

I agree with Danielle and CE. Why are we wasting time with therapies that are only equal to what we have now? Let's spend our money on more advanced research, like adult stem cells.

Here is a really great article: http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-smith042302.asp

This was written in 2002, so why is the media still obsessed with embryonic stem cells!!!

Zoe, all of the findings of the study were based upon improvement of physical symptoms not of actual disease progression on the cellular level. All of the treatments for Parkinson's, including prescription treatments, can’t stop or slow disease progression, they just help improve symptoms. Physical therapy has been shown to be very useful in improving physical functioning and this study has helped find an effective alternative in whole body vibration.

Even if vibrational therapy is as effective as physical therapy, does that really mean it helps treat the disorder? If symptoms of Parkinson's disease develop because brain cells malfunction and die, I can't imagine that physical therapy would be all that effective.

Ancient Greeks promoted vibration therapy to heal bruising and increase joint mobility (arthritis). Practitioners created vibration by placing a long piece of wood, which an assistant held, over the affected area. The practitioner would then use the patient's body as a stabilizer and saw the wood; vibrations of this motion would be transferred to the affected area. In 16th-Century Japan, a popular book advocated for the use of percussion and vibration massage to ameliorate rheumatic complaints and encourage the healing of broken bones. More than 40 years ago, the Russian space program noticed that astronauts returning from space experienced bone fractures and bone mass loss much earlier than their earth-bound counterparts. The Russians used whole body vibration devices to help build up the bone mass of astronauts. Today, NASA also uses vibration therapy to prevent the loss of bone mass in astronauts, particularly females, who are more prone to osteoporosis.

Advocates have promoted vibration therapy to treat a variety of other conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, phantom limb syndrome, cerebral palsy, arthritis, tinnitus, ulcers and fibromyalgia. They also claim that this modality reduces cellulite, regulates reproductive function, boosts the lymphatic system, improves wound healing and increases glucose and body metabolism.

Hmm, I'm not exactly sure what whole body vibrational therapy is. I'd like more information on what is involved and how it is supposed to work. Can anyone offer some insight?

I agree with your comment about the stem cell research, Danielle. You should also go back and read the March blog about the new stem cell research. The focus in the stem cell research community appears to be shifting towards adult-derived stem cells rather than embryonic.

What about the latest research on adult stem cells and Parkinson's?

Here is a really cool testimony from a man with Parkinson's who experienced a large amount of relief from trembling and his other symptoms after receiving an injection of his own stem cells: http://www.leaderu.com/science/stemcelltestimony_turner.html

I think we should be investing in more of this research and stop with the embryonic stem cells already.

In accepting the researchers' findings that whole body vibration is as effective as conventional physical therapy, what benefit does the new therapy provide over the old therapy? Is whole body vibration easier to perform, cheaper, have a higher availability to patients, or is it more comfortable for patients? Just because a new treatment can be shown to be as effective, this does not mean that it should replace conventional treatment.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Become a Fan