« Vitamins C and E Fall Short in Recent Studies | Main | Natural Standard Launches New Database: Environmental Resources »

December 02, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c7bb653ef01053629510d970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Caregiving Linked to Improved Longevity:

Comments

Was there a differentiation made among those who had assistance from Long-Term Care Insurance and those who did not?

I am surprised that 81 percent did not provide any living assistance to their spouses; the number seems high. Were the disabled spouses in care homes or living at home? I think that would make a difference because daily caregiving such as preparing meals and helping people get dressed may be provided in retirement homes. The report says they were living unassisted, but how severe were the disabilities? Perhaps many did not require or want help from their spouses?

I wonder if there is a difference between family (i.e., non-paid) caregivers versus those who are paid for their services.

Perhaps caregivers live longer because they have to. In other words, because they are depended upon, they cannot "afford to" die.

I always thought if you hung out with dying people you would begin dying too. I often try and be nice but just not hang out with those who are dying. This study is flawed and in the very least does not account for confounding factors or other reasons this population died less if they hugged more. Brown is on the right track scheduling a follow-up study examining the effect on well being. If the results are promising I will have to be nicer.

J. Young,

Yea, the definitions of what is considered "unassisted’"and other terms need to be presented with this interesting study. I know this is a blog, but I think it should be included. In the coming weeks I’ll try and look into this, but I could just make my hubby something tasty to eat knowing that it may help me to "not die."

Brown's study on the benefits of caregiving for the caregiver, soon to be published in the Journal of Psychological Science, provides scientific evidence for what one may intuit: there are both physical and psychological benefits to altruistic behavior. Further studies on the benefits of altruistic behavior will be of interest and add to our general understanding of humanity.

I have read many articles about how the mind can affect or control a person’s physical condition that I don’t doubt that this has something to do with this caregiving effect. This must be part of people’s reaction to helping their partners; they feel a purpose for their lives and a reason to keep on going. I think that in many cases older people lose this and feel that they are no longer needed by anyone; they loose old friends and in many cases, the family does not give them that extra support that they need at this stage in life. Caregiving is an incentive for them, and I am sure that it keeps them mentally occupied, not thinking all the time about their own problems. People need to feel some kind of purpose for their lives, and those who participate in caregiving must have positive feelings about themselves, which is a plus for their health.

I agree that altruistic caregiving can provide longevity to some individuals. Taking care of someone involves physical, as well as mental, activity. However, this study or future studies should also include other activities of the individuals. For example, what else stimulated the minds of both groups, and what other physical activities did both groups engage in?

When the authors stated, “These findings suggest that caregivers may actually benefit from providing care under some circumstances," what are the circumstances they are referring to? I think this study only reflects a small percentage of caregivers. Most caregivers become so involved in caring for the sick that their own health start to deteriorate.

I am looking forward to the new study mentioned in this article. Next year, in 2009, Brown is going to conduct a study on how altruistic behavior affects one’s sense of well-being. I am very interested in seeing the neurological effects of altruistic behavior. The brain is so fascinating!

I thought this blog was interesting, so I did a quick search for additional information on the topic. Dr. George E. Vaillant, a Harvard University research psychiatrist who drew from more than five decades of data from the Harvard Study of Adult Development, reports that helping behavior focused on others is among the strongest predictors of health and longevity. Midlarsky and Kahana {1994} associated adult helping behavior with improved morale, self-esteem, positive affect and well-being -- all with psychoneuroimmunological implications.

A study done by Kahana Eve and and Elizabeth Midlarsky on altruism, well-being and mental health in late life found that older adults were more likely to engage in altruistic behavior because it gave their lives meaning, and they were not motivated by secondary gains such as keeping busy, making, friends or being helped in return.

I do agree with the author that previous studies that have documented negative health effects of caregiving-presumed stress of providing help versus stress of witnessing a loved one suffer-need to be “disentangled.” It is one thing to assist another with simple activities of daily living (such as eating or dressing), but it is quite different when one is caring for someone with a chronic, debilitating illness or terminal condition.

I appreciate that this research is heading in a new direction. Caregiving for a loved one is commonly associated with increased stress and a decrease in one's quality of life. I think it is great that this research is exploring another effect. I guess that's one part of research. It doesn't have to always be about affirming what you already know, but what you might have missed. I hope future research is more conclusive.

Could it be that the caregivers were in better health conditions and had positive attitudes? They probably did not consider spouses’ disabilities as burdens and were not stressed by it.

Helping people in distress represents altruism, a form of prosocial behavior. It is the opposite of selfishness. I could see how this type of behavior could be linked to longevity. It would be a reason to keep you going and make you feel good about yourself. If it increases a sense of well being and pleasure in the brain I would think it would then increase the immune response. This type of prosocial behavior is very popular in some religions. It is a wonderful thing, and unfortunately, true selfless altruism is hard to find in our busy stressful lives these days.

I wonder if this is a bit biased since all the baby boomers are getting older, and there is already such a shortage of non-disgruntled workers in the elderly care sector. Maybe this is supposed to inspire old people to help each other? I can’t wait for the 2009 follow-up to see what happens neurologically when something the opposite of selfish happens...

This result is really surprising to me. It makes me wonder whether the caregivers lived longer because they became more/better educated about health and wellness as they took care of their spouses. Although the total number of subjects is large, the number of those who really got the altruistic benefit was really small, which makes me think there must be some other factors at play. The follow up will certainly be interesting, not to mention extremely relevant for the large number of graying boomers who need or will need help from their spouses and others.

I bet for some people, caregiving gives ‘em a boost, and I bet it actually kills some other people, depending on their condition and depending on how they feel about the person they are caring for. If the person is a real creep and you have to do helpful things while he/she is being obnoxious, then it could be detrimental. But maybe for your friendly grandma it would be different. This study’s not designed to get to the bottom of this.

Caring for others may have some benefits as the study mention, but there is also a dark side to being a caregiver. When a person starts caring for others more then they care for themselves, their own health may also start to deteriorate. Therefore, this study can only apply to caregivers to a certain extent but cannot be applied to all.

I'm quite skeptical about the findings of this study. I think it's an interesting and great that altruism can extend one's lifespan. However, I'd have to read more about it to be convinced.

Caregiving is a major social aspect of the culture where I originally came from (West Africa). I believe that taking care of a loved one gives you a purpose of life and keeps you going, thus helping you maintain that continuous flow of karma throughout the entire mind and body.

I personally believe this is not a very strong study. Also, can you please define the term “unassisted”? The way I see this is that perhaps caregiving keeps them mentally occupied so they are not thinking about their own problems, but caregiving can also be stressful in itself. Also, are there any other factors that may have stimulated the minds of both groups? This is an interesting study, but I’m still skeptical about the findings. Further studies on the benefits of altruistic behavior must be done to validate this study.

I feel that a caregiver can receive great rewards by helping the ones they love. This happiness and will to have their loved one live longer may be the strength they find within themselves to live longer. Once the loved one dies I've heard that the caregiver doesn't live too much longer because of the sadness and loneliness.

I think as caregivers take care of loved ones, they too turn to make better life choices for themselves, making them live better and healthier lives that contribute to their life expectancies.

I wonder if there would be a difference between those who are providing care to spouses/other loved ones as compared to those who provide care in a nursing home-type setting.

They said they controlled for health status and what not, but to me, with this study, I would just assume that the person who is being the caregiver would be healthier anyway and therefore live longer. But if the study is right, I suppose we should all make sure we treat are spouses well!

Thanks for sharing such a good information; brilliant concept!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.