Researchers in
Vitamin D is found in foods, such as eggs, fish
and fortified milk. It is also produced in the body after sun exposure.
Adequate vitamin D levels are necessary for the body to absorb the essential
minerals calcium and phosphorus. It is also important for immune system
function and healthy bones.
The researchers analyzed data from 124 adults
with type 2 diabetes from 2003 to 2008 and looked specifically at their
average glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and vitamin D levels. HbA1c levels are
used to measure how well diabetes is being controlled. The American Diabetes
Association recommends that patients with diabetes keep their HbA1c levels
below seven percent.
The researchers found that more than 91 percent
of the participants were vitamin D deficient, and only eight subjects reported
taking vitamin D supplements. Individuals with the lowest vitamin D levels had
the highest HbA1c levels, which indicated poor diabetes control.
The researchers also noted that this
association was even more pronounced among African Americans compared to
Caucasians
This recent study was presented at the annual
meeting of The Endocrine Society. It supports earlier findings that vitamin D
may be needed for proper pancreatic beta-cell function and insulin secretion.
However, this study does not prove a
cause-and-effect relationship between vitamin D deficiency and diabetes.
Additional research is needed to fully understand the potential correlation
between the two conditions.
For more information about vitamin D, please
visit Natural Standard's Foods,
Herbs & Supplements database.
To me, this is very interesting research and a significant finding in the diabetic world. I feel as though this research has a firm foundation under it because of the larger number of subjects included in the trial. I am excited to see more trials done regarding the association with vit D deficiency and increased blood sugar levels.
Posted by: lc | July 20, 2010 at 03:32 PM
Although these results are not conclusive, it's very interesting to see that this possible link between diabetes and vitamin D has been around for many years. I hadn't heard about this before now, but I will definitely be keeping an eye out for more studies in the future. In an earlier review of literature (PMID 15971062) published in 2005, they go into detail about the proposed role vitamin D plays in this interaction, and how there are receptors for vitamin D directly on the beta cells of the pancreas, and that there is a vitamin D-dependent calcium-binding protein that may protect beta cells from cytokine-mediated cell death.
So potentially, if vitamin D is allowing this protein to protect the insulin-producing beta cells, both type 1 and type 2 diabetics may benefit from supplementation of vitamin D. And if it is found to help, it will be very inexpensive for patients to take a vitamin daily to improve their diabetes. Very cool! I look forward to seeing further research in this area.
Posted by: RxCAM | July 20, 2010 at 04:26 PM
This study focused on type 2 diabetes, which is often closely tied to both the diet and exercise level of the person affected. I am curious to see if future studies can tie the correlation to vitamin D itself or the lack of sun exposure and outdoor activity, such as regular exercise, that may be lacking. Even if exercise is not lacking, we may discover that sun exposure is more important for a properly functioning body than previously known. Most of us actively hide from the sun these days in an attempt to avoid harmful exposure. Might this be another lesson in the need for moderation?
Posted by: Marie | July 21, 2010 at 11:37 AM
I found the results of this study very interesting. I wonder if taking vitamin D supplements could help improve blood glucose control and A1c in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Posted by: husky86 | July 23, 2010 at 12:59 PM
My neighbor has diabetes, and I’d better make a copy of this article for her. It is great to find another cause or related factor that links to poor diabetes control. If a patient can have better control over diabetes by supplementing vitamin D, it would be awesome. It is fairly easy to follow as well. It is frustrating sometimes to see people with diabetes who don’t have a good control over their blood sugar despite the proper efforts.
Posted by: scoupl | July 23, 2010 at 05:12 PM
I agree that at this point, there is a correlation between low vitamin D levels and high HbA1c levels. I did a research paper on low vitamin D levels and cardiovascular disease risk. The studies I reviewed showed a correlation there as well: participants in the studies with lower levels of vitamin D were at a higher risk for developing cardiovascular disease than the participants with normal levels of vitamin D. I think all of these data are pointing to the importance of vitamin D; now we need to figure out HOW vitamin D is impacting things like diabetes and heart disease. We have established a correlation, now we need to dig deeper!
Posted by: RxStudent2010 | July 26, 2010 at 08:02 AM
I agree. Vitamin D has been in the news more than any other vitamin this year. It definitely plays a major role in our physiology and more details are needed. Maybe vitamin D's role in our immune system is partially why it affects diabetes. Perhaps the cells of the pancreas are being damaged without proper immune protection and are in turn producing less insulin. Regardless, I think the publicity that vitamin D is receiving is positive. I hope it promotes more people to consider taking vitamin D and/or including it in their diet.
Posted by: pharmstud898 | July 28, 2010 at 02:48 PM
Is it possible that one reason for the correlation between vitamin D and poor diabetes control could be due to lifestyle? For example, vitamin D is produced in our bodies from sun exposure, which was already mentioned. And, a possible cause of diabetes could be from inappropriate eating habits and sedentary lifestyles. Linking the two, could it be possible that some of the individuals with diabetes also have an indoor-sedentary lifestyle that could contribute to the low levels of vitamin D?
Posted by: VD | July 28, 2010 at 06:29 PM
I agree that it can be easy to forget that correlation does not necessarily mean causation, but we should definitely continue to try to get more information on this topic. The vitamin D monograph on Natural Standard's website references a previous meta-analysis that showed that vitamin D improved insulin sensitivity. The monograph also references a study reporting that infants receiving calcitriol in their first year were less likely to develop type 1 diabetes.
Posted by: Steph B. | July 29, 2010 at 04:10 PM
I'm at risk for developing diabetes, and anything that could help me get on track to a healthy lifestyle is helpful. It's great to know that increasing a simple thing like vitamin D could help protect me from developing diabetes. Does anyone know if the amount of vitamin D found in foods (like the ones mentioned: eggs, fish and milk) will be adequate for this indication? How do I know how much vitamin D I need, and how do I know if the products I consume are giving me that amount?
Posted by: PJ | August 06, 2010 at 10:05 AM